Previously on the SIGOPS blog, we discussed the current status of artifact evaluation (AE) and how to improve it. At HotOS’23, we took another step in this direction: attendees discussed artifact evaluation in a panel led by Shriram Krishnamurthi (Brown), Margo Seltzer (UBC), and Neeraja Yadwadkar (UT Austin), and organized by Roberta De Viti (MPI-SWS), … Read more
Editor’s note: Since HotOS ’21, Systems Trivia has become systems researchers’ favorite activity – it’s always incredibly fun and educational. Systems Trivia was created by Roberta De Viti and Vaastav Anand who have then been successfully running it at HotOS ’21, SOSP ’21, and HotOS ’23. In this article, We invite Roberta and Vaastav to … Read more
Science should be transparent and reproducible. In computer science, this means code and data should be publicly available and anyone should be able to validate a paper’s claims given reasonable hardware. Dedicated scientists have made their code and data public for decades, but until recently, this was done in a decentralized fashion. Groups had their … Read more
Many CS systems and architecture conferences have a rebuttal phase or an author response period, where authors can respond to the questions asked by reviewers, and correct misunderstandings by reviewers. We discuss the pros and cons of this phase, and whether it is a net positive or negative for the community. The author response phase … Read more